I just said it could be embarrassing to understand my policies so little as to think they won’t get paid. I also said it would be embarrassing to live in San Francisco and speak about never letting the ignorance end. I implore people to consider geographic restructuring using all the available technology and unbelievable ideas coming out of the #Occupy movement on how to create a framework for a peaceful revolution using intellect to overcome the shackles of history and mountains of unjust legislature creating a bankrupt economy.
Unified Interdependent Autonomy ~ is what I would like to offer as an ideology
Kiosk-based local self-governance with a centralized administrative framework for smooth oversight of trade and interactions of interdependent regions.
Voluntary Cooperative Citizenship is what I would like to enact. I think any electable leader should offer their citizens a BUSINESS PLAN for how they would provide Services like regional and inter-regional transit, local infrastructures for food/shelter/safety, trade regulations, currency efficacy, population health and function for people at what cost, including their entire Tax/Revenue plan and allow individuals the choice to vote and then group according to high shared values. It is a brand-new idea and any revolution could fail. Given all the perspective I have, I think our chance of success and a thriving future is high, but we do need a brand-new currency and debt forgiveness to proceed. A hijack of the financial system is in the works on the principle that we have an overwhelming majority of humans in favor of change and a high level of faith in the pillar of autonomy.
An election for a set of leaders should be held after a comprehensive election, ID and currency system is established (kiosks). Then, after that, would-be citizens would have options for periodic policy enactment in a codified manner with allowances for time to be educated about proposed legislation. I think positions for “regional executive (prime minister) and fore-chosen administrative cabinet” to represent regions in matters of inter-regional interactions. I like the idea of distilling the best of what history has shown us contributes to a happy-functioning society and discarding policies that might be thought of retrospectively as “experimental”, as any law should be considered experimental and subject to evaluation for continued usefulness. There are conflicting ideas about the job of existing parliaments as citizens of nations would benefit from using kiosk survey to replace the decision-making proxy by [otherwise functionally removed] demi-citizens of Congress.
And without interest in personal gain, except for the tiny ego hit of helping Millions of people (the kermit-the-frog goal of "making millions of people happy"); and as all decisions are so global, new wonderful ideas would theoretically radiate out to help Billions of people live cooperatively and therefore, more happily, I wish the United States would immediately cease suppressing this revolution. I do not expect any greater reward than that provided by market forces and we can accomplish a complete overhaul of government with no bloodshed and very little, if any negative economic consequences. There may be loss of “power/influence” with a restructuring of society in all the different ways as required by this state of emergency. I cannot tolerate arguments about exact account digit increases anticipated by the new currency and questions of all-but-minute changes in living conditions when I have provided so many answers that have self-evident recognition as utmost salvation in terms of bodies-per-minute (a Global Value), human rights & civil liberties being restored and instituted by real decision-makers and eliminating the abuses by “police” of the world (a term I offer ideologically that is not the same as security/safety forces).
I encourage people to plan on regional variations in moral-code and micro-economic leadership with a fund established for re-location of citizens that feel at odds in their geographic locality with evolution of laws around “Law of Attraction“ principles. Participating nations could generate local “Constitutions” within frameworks of international cooperation along universal trade and human rights laws. With our available technology, we can even line-item vote on issues, requiring a level of majority that approaches consensus within realistic population participation variables. All laws can be decided by the citizens, with the first question being: Is a given bill “legislature-worthy moral code” or just the result of people overly-sensitive to other human nature? And require a threshold level to even consider a majority decision so that minority activist groups are restricted from passing unrepresentative laws. I especially appreciate the ability of this design to allow a low national tax rate (15% with generous dependent and business allowances will cover a healthy framework for an enterprising civilization). I anticipate another small tax (3-5%) for international businesses for international peace-keeping and administration of a version of the UN
(PS. To the dissidents on specific details, I am writing this guide on my fucking blog instead of the MEDIA that has Journalistic responsibilities to citizens as if I might be Blavatsky’d on the anticipated WHO adage that we are trying to FIX, Sarah Connor-style: “Suzanne and 42 knew it all“, as some assholes seem to be trying to enforce certain doom on hopes for campaign financing allowing their business to continue fucking people over. Let‘s wish us all luck, people!!!).
Without belaboring an entire tax plan for the plagiarism (times 3 years 10 months) I anticipate domicile-based simplification to help with the ethical discrepancies we might see if we analyzed how housing arrangements are recognized along narrow definitions. I would even identify a fundamental question for people to answer around ethics of legally defining family relationships at all. The current resource-allowances being defined around the few relationships recognized as gender-restricted “spouse“, “child” or “parent” with differential benefits and liabilities. Versus simply tallying Productive Adults and Dependents/Children to assess revenue responsibility.
Beyond a very streamlined income tax for widespread support of society, I like that revenue bills for specific community projects can be elected upon and implemented with more local autonomy so that time is not wasted on forcing behavior/ideology compliance in nations that can be defined more peacefully with a common framework not as tied to moral ideology. My policies are strengthened by my philosophy that I can by-pass differences of opinion by strategic legislation, using principles of subdividing larger geographic regions into autonomous community units, respecting cultural relativism to reduce legislation placed against the wishes/best interests of the people.
My governance plan includes as a given that citizens will be able to self-represent without the limits of past election systems. Functionally, I have co-created a sound plan for the use of highly representative technology via computer-kiosk-based voting and a cheap version of “government” that I think would be more reasonably defined as “policy administrators” with qualifications as experts in educating and organizing people to make informed decisions and implementing policy that is codified by popular vote at agreed-upon thresholds. An ideal role of government is as advocates for the people to mediate decisions and operations by public & private industries cooperating towards [otherwise collective] planetary resources traded for commerce and reward.
A remaining difficult part of the revolution seems to be that it upsets people that have been conditioned into fearing change, even though the level of understanding about the self-evident truths and the merry feasibility of my ideas is high. I have been learning a lot in this third part of “258”, on the exact nature of business (and interpersonal bad decisions that I like to attribute to defense mechanisms instead of labeling as untreatable behavior) and life beyond the Height of Civilization.
Then, there is the inflated sway of “political control” and the ego of making history that have been obstacles (…in the past, please?). If reform were even possible, I would consider it on the level of stabilizing and creating harmony. That has been the argument against Anarchy. Because of the evolving state of affairs between the multicultural citizens of the world and the institutionalized racism, we are achieving critical mass for change as necessary because the existing status quo is highly unstable. Like all of my biological esoterica that helps guide my humans-in-a-living-terrarium policy towards sustainability, I keep in mind that stability is a very important factor for survival of biological and psycho-social creatures.
I imagine the stability in our environment to a chemistry problem where people might be molecules of reactants and the more stable product intuitively has a lower energy of activation and so more reactants form the stable molecule. When the molecules are in a higher reactive state, there is less tendency towards stable molecule formation because of the formation of molecules that would otherwise not form. I also thought of it like the Ideal Gas Law: PV=nRT, where Pressure is emotional pressure, Volume is psychosocial space requirements, n is population, R= human nature/conditioning, T= emotional climate.
I have struggled with people over the moral imperative to speak out about the present rate of “bodies-per-minute”. I think that life is a nearly-universal value and bullying for supposed genetic purity has been misguided if not wholly criminal. Much of the destruction of valuable life has been based on bad policy coming out of the USA/Israel. I have martyr’d my family on how bad this situation is and I only pray “WHEN do they learn?” because I all-but-collapse on the mental-soul incompatibility of people fighting to be racist and choosing “not to learn” as a personal motto. I could describe almost any block considerations as self-evidently petty, if not ridiculous in the face of species-ism and THE [multidimensional nature of] SIMS.
Even within the USA, under the population management policies in place (that were halted on higher levels on 8Sept2011) we suffer disabilities-per-minute resulting from oppression (MH), exploitation (Banks/Wall Street), lack of social supports (GOP & Psychiatric “WHAT“) and other overcome-able issues like the debt crisis, government stand-still and ravaging of the environment leading to fundamental habitat destruction. So, I have also challenged people that otherwise subscribed to the resource sequestration from other nationalities on the point that they are all part of humanity that proves why it would be population-reduced on interpersonal misbehavior.
Unified Interdependent Autonomy ~ is what I would like to offer as an ideology
Kiosk-based local self-governance with a centralized administrative framework for smooth oversight of trade and interactions of interdependent regions.
Voluntary Cooperative Citizenship is what I would like to enact. I think any electable leader should offer their citizens a BUSINESS PLAN for how they would provide Services like regional and inter-regional transit, local infrastructures for food/shelter/safety, trade regulations, currency efficacy, population health and function for people at what cost, including their entire Tax/Revenue plan and allow individuals the choice to vote and then group according to high shared values. It is a brand-new idea and any revolution could fail. Given all the perspective I have, I think our chance of success and a thriving future is high, but we do need a brand-new currency and debt forgiveness to proceed. A hijack of the financial system is in the works on the principle that we have an overwhelming majority of humans in favor of change and a high level of faith in the pillar of autonomy.
An election for a set of leaders should be held after a comprehensive election, ID and currency system is established (kiosks). Then, after that, would-be citizens would have options for periodic policy enactment in a codified manner with allowances for time to be educated about proposed legislation. I think positions for “regional executive (prime minister) and fore-chosen administrative cabinet” to represent regions in matters of inter-regional interactions. I like the idea of distilling the best of what history has shown us contributes to a happy-functioning society and discarding policies that might be thought of retrospectively as “experimental”, as any law should be considered experimental and subject to evaluation for continued usefulness. There are conflicting ideas about the job of existing parliaments as citizens of nations would benefit from using kiosk survey to replace the decision-making proxy by [otherwise functionally removed] demi-citizens of Congress.
And without interest in personal gain, except for the tiny ego hit of helping Millions of people (the kermit-the-frog goal of "making millions of people happy"); and as all decisions are so global, new wonderful ideas would theoretically radiate out to help Billions of people live cooperatively and therefore, more happily, I wish the United States would immediately cease suppressing this revolution. I do not expect any greater reward than that provided by market forces and we can accomplish a complete overhaul of government with no bloodshed and very little, if any negative economic consequences. There may be loss of “power/influence” with a restructuring of society in all the different ways as required by this state of emergency. I cannot tolerate arguments about exact account digit increases anticipated by the new currency and questions of all-but-minute changes in living conditions when I have provided so many answers that have self-evident recognition as utmost salvation in terms of bodies-per-minute (a Global Value), human rights & civil liberties being restored and instituted by real decision-makers and eliminating the abuses by “police” of the world (a term I offer ideologically that is not the same as security/safety forces).
I encourage people to plan on regional variations in moral-code and micro-economic leadership with a fund established for re-location of citizens that feel at odds in their geographic locality with evolution of laws around “Law of Attraction“ principles. Participating nations could generate local “Constitutions” within frameworks of international cooperation along universal trade and human rights laws. With our available technology, we can even line-item vote on issues, requiring a level of majority that approaches consensus within realistic population participation variables. All laws can be decided by the citizens, with the first question being: Is a given bill “legislature-worthy moral code” or just the result of people overly-sensitive to other human nature? And require a threshold level to even consider a majority decision so that minority activist groups are restricted from passing unrepresentative laws. I especially appreciate the ability of this design to allow a low national tax rate (15% with generous dependent and business allowances will cover a healthy framework for an enterprising civilization). I anticipate another small tax (3-5%) for international businesses for international peace-keeping and administration of a version of the UN
(PS. To the dissidents on specific details, I am writing this guide on my fucking blog instead of the MEDIA that has Journalistic responsibilities to citizens as if I might be Blavatsky’d on the anticipated WHO adage that we are trying to FIX, Sarah Connor-style: “Suzanne and 42 knew it all“, as some assholes seem to be trying to enforce certain doom on hopes for campaign financing allowing their business to continue fucking people over. Let‘s wish us all luck, people!!!).
Without belaboring an entire tax plan for the plagiarism (times 3 years 10 months) I anticipate domicile-based simplification to help with the ethical discrepancies we might see if we analyzed how housing arrangements are recognized along narrow definitions. I would even identify a fundamental question for people to answer around ethics of legally defining family relationships at all. The current resource-allowances being defined around the few relationships recognized as gender-restricted “spouse“, “child” or “parent” with differential benefits and liabilities. Versus simply tallying Productive Adults and Dependents/Children to assess revenue responsibility.
Beyond a very streamlined income tax for widespread support of society, I like that revenue bills for specific community projects can be elected upon and implemented with more local autonomy so that time is not wasted on forcing behavior/ideology compliance in nations that can be defined more peacefully with a common framework not as tied to moral ideology. My policies are strengthened by my philosophy that I can by-pass differences of opinion by strategic legislation, using principles of subdividing larger geographic regions into autonomous community units, respecting cultural relativism to reduce legislation placed against the wishes/best interests of the people.
My governance plan includes as a given that citizens will be able to self-represent without the limits of past election systems. Functionally, I have co-created a sound plan for the use of highly representative technology via computer-kiosk-based voting and a cheap version of “government” that I think would be more reasonably defined as “policy administrators” with qualifications as experts in educating and organizing people to make informed decisions and implementing policy that is codified by popular vote at agreed-upon thresholds. An ideal role of government is as advocates for the people to mediate decisions and operations by public & private industries cooperating towards [otherwise collective] planetary resources traded for commerce and reward.
A remaining difficult part of the revolution seems to be that it upsets people that have been conditioned into fearing change, even though the level of understanding about the self-evident truths and the merry feasibility of my ideas is high. I have been learning a lot in this third part of “258”, on the exact nature of business (and interpersonal bad decisions that I like to attribute to defense mechanisms instead of labeling as untreatable behavior) and life beyond the Height of Civilization.
Then, there is the inflated sway of “political control” and the ego of making history that have been obstacles (…in the past, please?). If reform were even possible, I would consider it on the level of stabilizing and creating harmony. That has been the argument against Anarchy. Because of the evolving state of affairs between the multicultural citizens of the world and the institutionalized racism, we are achieving critical mass for change as necessary because the existing status quo is highly unstable. Like all of my biological esoterica that helps guide my humans-in-a-living-terrarium policy towards sustainability, I keep in mind that stability is a very important factor for survival of biological and psycho-social creatures.
I imagine the stability in our environment to a chemistry problem where people might be molecules of reactants and the more stable product intuitively has a lower energy of activation and so more reactants form the stable molecule. When the molecules are in a higher reactive state, there is less tendency towards stable molecule formation because of the formation of molecules that would otherwise not form. I also thought of it like the Ideal Gas Law: PV=nRT, where Pressure is emotional pressure, Volume is psychosocial space requirements, n is population, R= human nature/conditioning, T= emotional climate.
I have struggled with people over the moral imperative to speak out about the present rate of “bodies-per-minute”. I think that life is a nearly-universal value and bullying for supposed genetic purity has been misguided if not wholly criminal. Much of the destruction of valuable life has been based on bad policy coming out of the USA/Israel. I have martyr’d my family on how bad this situation is and I only pray “WHEN do they learn?” because I all-but-collapse on the mental-soul incompatibility of people fighting to be racist and choosing “not to learn” as a personal motto. I could describe almost any block considerations as self-evidently petty, if not ridiculous in the face of species-ism and THE [multidimensional nature of] SIMS.
Even within the USA, under the population management policies in place (that were halted on higher levels on 8Sept2011) we suffer disabilities-per-minute resulting from oppression (MH), exploitation (Banks/Wall Street), lack of social supports (GOP & Psychiatric “WHAT“) and other overcome-able issues like the debt crisis, government stand-still and ravaging of the environment leading to fundamental habitat destruction. So, I have also challenged people that otherwise subscribed to the resource sequestration from other nationalities on the point that they are all part of humanity that proves why it would be population-reduced on interpersonal misbehavior.
No comments:
Post a Comment